You Know You've Been Unemployed a Long Time When... - Mo's Journal
You Know You've Been Unemployed a Long Time When...|
|Date:||August 14th, 2010 06:38 pm (UTC)|| |
Though I'm thinking more wry than dark.
Big questions now - partner/no partner; and kids/no kids. The kids, if they exist, have to be at least 18, else I can't see a mom chancing incarceration.
Big challenge now is to keep MC from being a total Mary Sue.
- - - -
I figure I'll knock this out while I'm at Mass. Gen. How hard could it be??
|Date:||August 14th, 2010 09:15 pm (UTC)|| |
I don't know if it's a man or a woman but in my conception there's definitely a partner and kids. The protagonist isn't expecting to be away from the kids, because the protagonist isn't expecting to go to prison for a long time - s/he needs a conviction and incarceration so s/he can have a wrongful death lawsuit, but the idea is for the partner to bring forward the witness as soon as the protag is settled in prison. And the partner is begging the protag not to do it because something could go wrong and she'd be left alone with the kids and her beloved in prison. Which is, of course, what happens.
Should we both write it, then compare?
|Date:||August 15th, 2010 06:07 pm (UTC)|| |
I think MC has to be a women - the central premise is, here's this brilliant 50-something-er who has become invisible to people who don't already know her; or she's immediately grokked as scary!Mommy or the fifth grade teacher they hated.
Similarly, I don't think she's partnered; I don't think someone with a competent other in her life would put the energy into this that it requires. First, she's driven in part by $-based desperation, and I don't see that in the partnered out-of-work or underemployed women I know (and the more I think about it, the more I realize that an awful lot of women I know who were working FT or happily PT a few years ago aren't working, or working much, right now, for a lot of reasons but the economy is at the root of most of them).
Also (remember, I'm not thinking a straight Mary Sue, or Mo insertion, here) she's motivated by, I guess I'd call it a drop in status. In partnered people, there's a bit of borrowing (I know a lot of people who will say "my parents were professors" when they mean "my dad was a prof") but the MC doesn't have that. If she can pull this off, she's proven she's smarter than an awful lot of people; and along the way she ends up figuring out several other murder cases that she ultimately decides she can't frame herself for, which brings some satisfaction (with added plot complications of, how do you tell the police who done it w/o bringing attention to oneself?)
Or maybe I'm just showing my standard lack in interest in writing romantic relationships!
|Date:||August 15th, 2010 06:09 pm (UTC)|| |
BTW, a lot of the invisibility thing is what I've been experiencing the past year or two. It's very strange, and I don't like it one bit. But no more about that on LJ!
|Date:||August 15th, 2010 11:07 pm (UTC)|| |
If you want to talk about it elsewhere I'm all ears (or, I guess, eyes).
|Date:||August 15th, 2010 10:11 pm (UTC)|| |
Hmmm. I don't want it to be a Mary Sue but I think whether male or female the character has to be the breadwinner for the family. I think s/he has to be motivated by financial desperation. I don't think loss of status will do it, because Convicted Murderer is lower status than SAHM. So I think it's either:
- a married man in a traditional family
- a woman in a lesbian couple where she's always been the breadwinner; or
- a single parent.
But with the single parent I have the problem you mentioned of not wanting to leave her kids (although if she's desperate enough and confident enough this will work I can see it) and also the problem of she needs someone she's confiding in to try to talk her out of this. Still, I guess it doesn't have to be a partner.
FWIW being I've been out of work when partnered and when unpartnered and I was not less desperate when partnered. It depends who the partner is, among other things.