?

Log in

No account? Create an account
What Does It Mean to Say that Slash is (or isn't) Subversive? - Mo's Journal
January 22nd, 2007
05:12 pm

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
What Does It Mean to Say that Slash is (or isn't) Subversive?

(75 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:mofic
Date:January 23rd, 2007 02:24 am (UTC)
(Link)
I should write a post on "What I Learned Writing My First Poll." Anyway, one thing I learned was to better clarify what I was asking. I did not mean for this to be a poll on whether slash as a whole is subversive. I was getting at something more specific - that if you as a reader deem a particular work of slash subversive or you as a writer see yourself as writing subversive slash, what do you think it's subverting?

And actually my head kind of spins when I think about whether realistic m/m depictions are more subversive (because they challenge compulsory heterosexuality and classic romance tropes) or the romance-novel-turned-slash stories you mention are more subversive, because they challenge the reality of homoerotic desire and male/male sex and replace it with a woman's fantasy. I mean I know I prefer realistic slash, but is a preference for realism inherently conformist? I know I've seen a lot of arguments in favor of the feminization of male characters (which I personally find distasteful) in slash, seeing that pattern as an expression of female creativity and of women creating for other women. Well, as I said, it makes my head spin a bit to think about that.




I think a lot of people start writing slash and then feel the need to justify themselves and so claim they're doing it to be transgressive or subversive


Now that's an intriguing thought! Where does that need to justify come from, do you think?

Thanks for stopping by...
Mofic Powered by LiveJournal.com