?

Log in

No account? Create an account
What Does It Mean to Say that Slash is (or isn't) Subversive? - Mo's Journal
January 22nd, 2007
05:12 pm

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
What Does It Mean to Say that Slash is (or isn't) Subversive?

(75 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:mofic
Date:January 23rd, 2007 03:19 am (UTC)
(Link)
I won't beat you about the head and shoulders - or anywhere else. I'm not a beat-about-the-head-and-shoulders type.

I wasn't actually expressing an opinion that slash as a genre is subversive. I think it sometimes is and sometimes isn't. What I wanted to know was for that subset that someone thinks is subversive, what do you think it subverts? Because prior to this discussion I saw in lemurgrrrl's journal, I really thought the answer for everyone was "presumptions of heterosexuality" or some variation thereof. But what I saw in the aforementioned discussion was people talking about slash as subversive or transgressive when it subverted authorial intent, which I think would be true of fanfic in general.

Anyway, I will know a little more about poll construction for the next one.
[User Picture]
From:xtricks
Date:January 23rd, 2007 03:37 am (UTC)
(Link)
My sense of what's subversive about slash is the subversion of canon or authorial control. The second, and important to me, is the reclaiming of creativity from mass-produced corporate ownership.

[User Picture]
From:mofic
Date:January 23rd, 2007 12:18 pm (UTC)
(Link)
But do you see that kind of subversion as specific to slash, or true of fanfic in general? After all, an author's reach should exceed canon's grasp or what's a fanfic for?
Mofic Powered by LiveJournal.com