Log in

No account? Create an account
What Does It Mean to Say that Slash is (or isn't) Subversive? - Mo's Journal — LiveJournal
January 22nd, 2007
05:12 pm


Previous Entry Share Next Entry
What Does It Mean to Say that Slash is (or isn't) Subversive?

(75 comments | Leave a comment)

[User Picture]
Date:January 24th, 2007 01:15 am (UTC)

Re: here from metafandom

Yeah, but that's the thing, anything can be seen as subversive. Turning in a blank paper as homework, refusing McDonald's, walking only backwards. What makes slash more subversive than any of these?

Just like you can claim pretty much anything as subversive (if the whole fandom is crazy for a particular slash pairing, I'm subversive if I'm the lone supporter of the unpopular het pairing, right? I'm subverting fandom hegemony!) as long as you pick the right frame of reference. Anything can also be claimed to be not subversive given the same frame of reference.

Personally? I'm not much of a feminist. But I can easily see how one could claim that slash really is just more of the same old male worship, female minimalization, denying and villifying female sexuality (ewww het! of course male sex is so much cleaner and better and not icky! and of course only male characters are worthy of exploration!) and penis envy. As a person who likes slash I know it's not penis envy. But at the same time I think that from *the outside* a slasher trying to explain that it's not penis envy is like a straight guy trying to explain why circle jerks are not gay. It all depends on what lense you want to choose.

Yeah, of course this kind of intellectual masturbation is a lot of fun (and again, I mean this in the most positive sense of the world; I love fandom; I love meta; I love discussing things that have been discussed over a trillion times most of the time). One just has to be aware of the limits.

And again, I want to point to romance novels as an example of female fiction for females, centered around female sexuality. Seems that nowadays you can even even publish your personal alien-with-two-dicks rape fantasies, domina fic, submissive fic, not to mention that the ancient bodice rippers are of course about various whore/slavegirl/rape fantasies. Or your random run the mill courting, happy domestic desires. In slash all one does is project them. Is that better? Worse? Is it healthier that the project our fantasies on characters rather than fantasize about ourselves? Is it unhealthier? Are these things we feel we have to be cured of and that's why we project them? Should we try to cure ourselves? Should we admit them and tell us that they are okay? Are these our own fantasies or something a supposed patriachal hegemony instilled in us?

Meh, I say it's just a kink.
[User Picture]
Date:January 24th, 2007 01:37 am (UTC)

Re: here from metafandom

What makes slash more subversive than any of these?

If you're interested in understanding why I see slash as potentially subversive, read the next post. If not, don't. I won't try to restate or argue with you here.
Mofic Powered by LiveJournal.com